The mirage of change - How corporate theories influence the behavior of the electorate

Abstract

The need of change has been introduced into the collective mentality through the organizational culture many years ago. Nobody explains why change is mandatory, why it would be made, but the effects of this approach upon the perception of the employees is maximum. This need has been progressively pronounced along with the increasing number of young people being part of training organizations in order to implement the organisational culture - all these trainings having the key-word: change – inoculating the need of change. We can find all this theory for change in specialized books particularly in corporate context, where the new culture of change started, equalizing the coorporatist thinking.This situation could explain why the Romanians have been voting for change since 2004, wwithout any other reason. The only reason was only the same need of change. Thus the results of the election from 2016 can be explaned in the same way, when USR became part of the Romanian Parliament with almost 9%. But in the following four years, the need for change gained more and more ground, winning a higher percent of voters, exceeding the corporate boundaries. The Parliamentary election results in 2020 in Romania shows the succes of this strategy: USR almost 16%, AUR almost 10%. The last party being almost unknown until the election day.